| It's a public toilet, which is useful when travelling. | The rating is extremely low, suggesting significant issues. |
| Located in Armidale, providing a convenient option for locals and visitors. | Likely lacks cleanliness and maintenance. |
| Offers a basic level of sanitation. | May be poorly equipped or have unpleasant odours. |
| Could be unsafe or have security concerns. | |
| The opening hours are not specified, creating uncertainty for users. |
| It's a public toilet, which is useful when travelling. | The rating is extremely low, suggesting significant issues. |
| Located centrally on Faulkner Street. | Seems to be poorly maintained. |
| Provides basic facilities. | Could benefit from better cleaning. |
| No opening hours listed, which is inconvenient. | |
| The overall experience is reportedly quite unpleasant. |
| Conveniently located near the Visitor Information Centre. | Suffers from a noticeable unpleasant odour. |
| Provides basic toilet facilities for travellers. | Requires more frequent cleaning to maintain hygiene. |
| Overall cleanliness is a concern. |
| Clean facilities | Google Maps may direct users to the incorrect location |
| Plenty of toilet paper available | Very basic in design |
| Basic amenities provided | Limited features beyond essential toilet facilities |
| Easy to find (despite initial Google Maps confusion) | |
| Well-maintained |
| It's a public toilet, which is a necessity when out and about. | The rating is extremely low, suggesting significant issues. |
| Located in Curtis Park, convenient for park users. | Reports indicate a generally unclean and unhygienic environment. |
| Provides a basic facility in the Armidale CBD. | Maintenance appears to be lacking; facilities are often broken or damaged. |
| Some users have mentioned unpleasant odours. | |
| Limited accessibility for people with disabilities has been raised. | |
| Could benefit from better lighting and security. |
| It's a public bathroom, which is a necessity when travelling. | The rating is extremely low, suggesting significant issues. |
| Location is convenient for those in the Seaton Street area. | Reports indicate a lack of cleanliness. |
| Provides basic facilities. | Some users have mentioned unpleasant odours. |
| Maintenance appears to be lacking. | |
| Could benefit from better ventilation. | |
| Not a pleasant experience overall. |
| Toilet facilities were clean and tidy. | The grass was too high. |
| Surprisingly clean, even on Christmas Eve. | Tables and chairs needed maintenance. |
| Clean. | |
| A good facility. |